The academic publishing industry is facing a hidden crisis caused by the rise of AI-generated papers and the exploitation of researchers through predatory practices. Many researchers remain underpaid while academic publishing companies rake in huge profits each year from their work. 

Researchers who lack funding and connections are not given the opportunity to share their research in quality scientific journals and often have no option but to publish in journals with less visibility and poorer editorial standards. Despite the quality of their research findings, their work tends to get published alongside AI-generated papers full of poorly-executed research, inaccurate findings, and fake citations.

‍

These problems not only threaten the quality of scientific research but also raise concerns about the future of academic publishing.

Exploitation of Researchers

The academic publishing industry is a highly profitable sector, with profit margins reaching as high as 40%. Ironically, many researchers remain overworked and underpaid. The publishing system exploits researchers by requiring them to produce content with little to no compensation, while publishing companies earn millions from disseminating their work. 

Open access to research allows research findings to be freely accessible to the public. However, the cost of making this research free is shifted to the researchers, who need to pay article processing charges to have their work published. These can range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars. For instance, publishing in a prestigious journal can cost upwards of $3,000 to $5,000. 

Check out these stats from 2015-2018:

• Total article processing fees paid to top publishers Elsevier, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley to publish with open access: $1.06 billion
• Revenue made from open access:
  • Springer Nature: $589.7 million
  • Elsevier: $221.4 million
  • Wiley: $114.3 million
  • Taylor & Francis: $76.8 million
  • Sage: $31.6 million

These fees are supposed to cover the costs of peer review, editing, and distribution, but they can be too expensive for researchers from developing countries or those working at underfunded institutions. Even when researchers in developing countries produce valuable research, they may turn to “predatory” publications that promise to publish their work in exchange for a fee but often lack proper peer review or editorial standards to ensure the accuracy of the published work.

Another form of exploitation comes in the form of peer review services done for free. Peer review is a critical part of the academic publishing process, ensuring that research meets the necessary standards before it is published. However, despite the time and effort required to conduct thorough reviews, researchers are typically not compensated for this work.

Research journals—especially those owned by large for-profit publishers—rely heavily on this unpaid labor to maintain their operations. These publishers generate revenue through publication fees, subscriptions, and open access charges, yet they do not fairly split this revenue with the researchers actually providing peer review services. This system exploits researchers who contribute their expertise for free, while the journals profit from their labor.

To make matters worse, a significant portion of research funding comes from government sources, meaning public money is used to fund the salaries of researchers and the costs associated with conducting research. However, after producing research, the government and other institutions must pay again to access these results through expensive journal subscriptions. This results in a scenario where the public effectively pays twice: once for the research itself and again to access the published results. This allows publishers to get away with huge profits with minimal expenses.

Unequal Distribution of Resources

Another major issue in academic publishing is the unequal access to funding and support systems. Researchers in well-resourced institutions, often located in developed countries, have more access to prestigious journals. They can afford the high publication fees, have better support systems for preparing and submitting papers, and often have established networks that facilitate easier acceptance into top-tier journals.

In contrast, researchers in developing countries lack access to the same level of mentorship, professional networks to collaborate with, research facilities, and publishing opportunities. As a result, their work receives less recognition, leaving them with fewer chances to share their valuable contributions with the rest of the community.

AI-Generated Academic Papers

Generative AI is being used to produce huge volumes of fake research papers, complete with fake citations and data. Often, these are written so well that existing editorial review systems — especially in less prestigious academic journals—fail to detect them.

One of the most glaring examples of this issue is what happened with Wiley, a major academic publisher with a history spanning over 200 years. This year, Wiley faced a crisis that led to the retraction of over 11,300 papers, many of which were AI-generated.

‍

Wiley shut down 19 of their journals under Hindawi, which were flooded with fabricated papers, primarily from content mills. These are businesses that produce fake research papers for a fee, often using AI to generate the entire content. 

To understand the scale of the issue, consider this: the 19 journals Wiley shut down were just a small fraction of the company’s portfolio, which includes over 2,000 titles. The journals were not among Wiley’s top-tier offerings, so the editorial process and peer review standards were not as rigid. However, there may be many, many more that simply have not yet been detected by the publishing team. The problem is so widespread that even medical research has been affected.

Identifying fake papers, retracting the ones that manage to get published, and correcting any misinformation caused by sharing them with the rest of the scientific community can be very costly. Moving forward, publishing companies will have to invest more time, money, and effort to identify these fake research papers instead of focusing on promoting genuine scientific advancements.

‍

How Blockchain Technology Can Help

Blockchain technology has the potential to address several of the issues plaguing the academic publishing industry.

Enhancing Transparency and Integrity

A decentralized peer review system could be implemented on the blockchain. Instead of relying on a small group of reviewers chosen by a journal, the blockchain could allow any expert to participate in reviewing and verifying research. Each reviewer’s comments and decisions would be recorded on the blockchain, creating a transparent review process that is difficult to manipulate or fake. This would reduce the risk of paper mills exploiting weak peer review systems.

Reducing Exploitation of Researchers

One way to address the exploitation of researchers who provide unpaid peer review services is through tokenization. Digital tokens can be used as incentives for reviewers, which they could then use to pay for publication fees or funding for their own research work. This would create a more equitable system where researchers get fairly compensated for their contributions.

Blockchain can also reduce the high costs of publishing by enabling decentralized platforms for academic publishing. These platforms could operate with lower overhead costs compared to traditional publishers, as they wouldn’t require centralized management or profit-driven models. Researchers could publish their work at a fraction of the cost.

Ensuring Equitable Access and Resource Distribution

Blockchain technology can support crowdfunding models where researchers can raise funds for their projects directly from the community. By tokenizing research proposals, researchers could secure micro-funding from anyone interested in the research topics. This is especially useful for researchers from less well-established institutions who have limited access to grants and financial support needed to conduct and publish high-quality research. To ensure fair distribution of resources, smart contracts and DAOs can be used to manage collaborations.

Preventing the Spread of Fraudulent Research

Recording each step of the research process on the blockchain, from data collection to final publication, can help prevent the publication of fraudulent research by allowing anyone to trace the origins of the data and verify its authenticity. If any part of the research process is found to be faked by the researchers, AI-generated, or lacking in some way, the blockchain records can be examined, and the research is declared null and void.

‍