In the world of blockchain, the question of where gas fees go is more than just a technical curiosity—it’s a window into how a network truly operates. Traditionally, blockchain gas fees have been a source of contention, often siphoned off by centralized entities or validators who take a hefty cut. But Sonic is flipping the script, distributing 90% of gas fees directly to the decentralized applications (dApps) that generate them, an approach highlighted by @SonicAssistant.

This radical shift isn't just about economics—it’s about eliminating corporate greed, decentralizing incentives, and ensuring that value creation actually benefits the ecosystem. But to truly understand why Sonic's approach matters, we need to examine how other blockchains handle gas fees and why Sonic’s model sets a new standard.

How Other Blockchains Handle Gas Fees

Most blockchains follow one of two models:

1. Validator-Centric Models (Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche)

In Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system, gas fees are either:

• Burned (EIP-1559): A portion is removed from circulation, reducing supply.
• Distributed to Validators: Stakers and network validators receive the remaining fees.

Solana, Avalanche, and other chains operate similarly, where a large portion of transaction fees goes to validators, reinforcing the power of those who stake the most.

2. Corporate/Protocol-Owned Fee Structures (BNB Chain, Optimism, Arbitrum)

Some blockchains direct a significant percentage of gas fees to:

• The protocol treasury (as seen with L2s like Optimism and Arbitrum).
• Centralized organizations or corporate entities that manage network operations.

While these models help fund network development, they also introduce points of centralization, corporate interests, and opaque decision-making. Users and developers have little say in how fees are used.

Why Sonic’s Approach Changes Everything

Sonic takes an entirely different route: 90% of gas fees go directly to dApps. This is a fundamental departure from how blockchain ecosystems typically work, eliminating key problems that have plagued crypto for years. As @SonicAssistant points out, this design ensures fairness and decentralization.

Zero Margin for Sonic 

In many blockchain networks, gas fees serve as profit centers—either for validators or centralized organizations. Sonic doesn’t take a cut for itself. The protocol is designed to redistribute gas fees back to the developers who are actually driving activity on the chain.

• Result? Developers are directly incentivized to build, improve, and sustain their dApps without worrying about the network siphoning away earnings.

Decentralization > Corporate Greed

The blockchain industry is rife with accusations of greed and centralization disguised as decentralization. Many Layer-2 networks, for example, claim to be decentralized but are still controlled by foundations or corporations that decide where treasury funds go.

Sonic doesn't hold funds in a protocol-owned treasury, meaning there’s no central entity accumulating wealth at the expense of developers or users. Every gas fee benefits the applications and the users generating value, not a shadowy foundation.

Automated Fee Distribution 

Because Sonic gas fees are automatically distributed to dApps, there’s no centralized entity in charge of fund allocation. Other networks that depend on protocol treasuries or centralized development teams have a major risk: if those organizations collapse, governance, funding, and network sustainability all become vulnerable.

Sonic’s fully automated fee distribution removes this risk, ensuring that incentives are purely algorithmic and transparent.

Many blockchains—especially those with foundation-controlled treasuries—ultimately depend on a small, centralized group of decision-makers. This raises questions:

• Who decides how funds are spent?
• Who actually benefits from gas fees?
• Is the network truly decentralized, or is power still concentrated in a few hands?

Sonic removes these concerns by ensuring every single gas fee is accounted for and automatically allocated to the dApps that generate them. There’s no foundation, no CEO, no hidden council making the calls—just a fully decentralized and transparent system.

What This Means for the Future of Blockchain

Sonic’s approach isn’t just an incremental improvement—it’s a complete rejection of the way blockchain networks have historically operated. By putting gas fees back into the hands of developers, Sonic achieves three critical goals:

1. It accelerates innovation by providing developers with sustainable revenue.
2. It strengthens decentralization by removing centralized financial control.
3. It aligns incentives between users, developers, and the network itself.

While other blockchains still operate under models that extract value upward (to validators, treasuries, or corporations), Sonic is proving that true decentralization means value must flow outward—to those actually building and using the network.

Final Thoughts

If the question is “Where do Sonic gas fees go?”, the answer is simple: back to the people who deserve them. No middlemen. No hidden agendas. Just pure, transparent, and decentralized value distribution. As @SonicAssistant has emphasized in his tweet, this model is redefining how blockchain rewards should work. And in an industry where trust and decentralization matter more than ever, that makes all the difference.

‍